--- Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net> wrote:
> From Ramsey Thu May  6 06:14:48 1999
> X-Apparently-To: gsquared100@yahoo.com via
> mdd501.yahoomail.com
> Received: from anon.lcs.mit.edu (18.26.0.254)
>   by mta118.yahoomail.com with SMTP; 6 May 1999
> 06:17:03 -0700
> Date: 6 May 1999 13:14:48 -0000
> Message-ID:
> <19990506131448.26439.qmail@nym.alias.net>
> From: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
> To: gsquared100@yahoo.com
> Subject: My Theory
> Content-Length: 1596
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> I will say that I believe the killer is in Atlanta.
> I think he 
> was a business acquaintance of John's. I love Pamela
> but I do not 
> believe in the retaliatory theory. I think the
> person who killed 
> JonBenet was a sick and twisted individual who was
> sexually 
> obsessed with her. I think he stalked her for a
> short time. I 
> think he DID approach her and talked to her prior to
> her death. I 
> have learned a little more about the bizarre
> practices of certain 
> people through the correspondences of this address.
> Some have 
> described in detail, how they killed JonBenet.
> Though it can be 
> discounted as a lie, it is a flipside, in contrast
> with all the 
> theories so far. I do think he possibly had business
> dealings 
> with John that went all the way to Boulder or
> possibly, stayed 
> here in Atlanta. 
> 
> Yes, the family is afraid to some degree. Mostly the
> Ramseys are concerned for their child and the
> children of others. Everything John has ever
> touched, turns to gold, which might breed jealousy
> among those closely or distantly working with John.
> That was only one of many theories. I also pointed
> out that I believe a total stranger to John might
> have done this; a stalker and child killer.
> 
> Because of my above theory, I have been accused of
> being this 
> business connection with John. After all, I live in
> Atlanta. I 
> have had my writing supposedly analyzed by software
> that matches 
> the ransom note. It also matches the writing style
> of Patricia 
> Ramsey but that does not prove I am either. Anyway,
> who knows the 
> validity of some stranger's writing style analysis
> software?
> 
> Thank You